English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Access to Nutrition and Exercise Programs Overall Rank: 140
Percentage of mental health consumers who are able to access nutrition and exercise programs.
Domain : Accessibility
Clients/patients are able to obtain care and services at the right place and the right time, based on their respective needs. Accessibility would include such things as waiting times, physician availability, geographical proximity, extended service hours, etc.
Additional Domain(s) : Rehabilitation, Unemployed
Rationale
a) Effective Practice (what is the practice that you wish to measure?): Opportunities to access healthy living practices.
b) Purpose of Measurement (what do you wish to measure: implementation of the practice, or patient outcome?): Can individuals with no health care benefits take part in healthy lifestyle activities.
Primary Reference
CEQM Survey 2, Expert Participant #72
Level of Evidence
IV: Evidence based on individual expert opinion.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • * It’s difficult to identify mental health consumers as separate from health consumers and primary care.
  • * This is very important to the treatment and well-being of consumers. Accessibility is currently lacking in this area.
  • * This indicator should take into account existence of programs, location, cost, client's comfort level and need.
  • While important to recovery, seems to be outside the scope/funding of primary care; a referral to these services is about all that seems feasible.
  • Limited income and issues of obesity/diabetes make nutrition a key component of health care/recovery/long term well being
  • This is not actionable in rural areas, with limited afforadable programs.
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 142
Actionability 152
Overall Importance 119
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 147
Clinicians 131
Consumers 136
Decision Makers 140
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 132
Rural Areas 121
Federal Stakeholders 148
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
146 130 137 97 136 149 137 136 92 135 160 107 127
 
Overall Rank

      

140


SW01h (H194)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.07 2.02 2.91 3.09 12.9 17.1 23.51 24.72 12.69
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.6 2.45 3.97 6.87 17.75 26.45 18.35 14.86 7.7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
14.06 60.05 25.89
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada