English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Case Registries for Schizophrenia Overall Rank: 143
All individuals with schizophrenia within primary health care are recorded on a case register.
Psychosis refers to a serious mental disorder (such as schizophrenia) characterized by defective or lost contact with reality, often with hallucinations or delusions.
Additional Domain(s) : Patients with Chronic Conditions
Rationale
Primary care professionals have an important part to play in the physical and mental health care of people with schizophrenia. They are best placed to monitor the physical health of people with schizophrenia and should do so regularly. Case registers will be an important means of doing so. In addition, primary care workers should monitor the mental health and treatment of their service users, work closely with secondary services and refer before crises arise wherever possible.
Primary Reference
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. (2002). Schizophrenia: Core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care. London, UK: National Institute for Clinical Excellence
Retrieved on Aug 3, 2006 from: http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=CG001NICEguideline
Level of Evidence
III: Preliminary research evidence only or evidence based on consensus opinion only.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • * This is important for population level surveillance and not for quality of care - there are many regulatory barriers.
  • * Recovery from psychotic illness is encumbered by stigma. This may serve to raise the stigma.
  • * I am absolutely opposed to this.
  • *This brings may raise privacy concerns and if used the registry should be without names, using random identification numbers to maintain confidentiality
  • yes but without names, just by #'s with privacy code to maintain confidentiality
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 152
Actionability 133
Overall Importance 130
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 125
Clinicians 138
Consumers 158
Decision Makers 126
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 121
Rural Areas 145
Federal Stakeholders 136
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
116 128 110 93 149 137 126 139 110 151 150 127 156
 
Overall Rank

      

143


SA11e (H1132)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4.44 1.53 8.81 5.82 12.48 15.55 25.41 18.76 7.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2.99 2.51 3.97 4.33 12.89 16.09 29.54 15.95 11.73
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
31.22 46.17 22.61
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada