English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Modified School Programs For Severe Mental Illness Overall Rank: 75
Youth and adults diagnosed with severe mental illness (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or severe anxiety disorder) should be offered modifications in standard academic educational programs (e.g. college, high school) which allow them to learn at their own pace within a personalized support program.
The restoration of a person by therapeutic measures and re-education to participation in the activities of a normal life within the limitations of the person’s disorder or disability.
Additional Domain(s) : School-based Mental Health Services, Patients with Psychosis
Rationale
Programs developed in partnership with schools to enable patients to learn at their own pace with a personalized support program for patients aged 15-64 years diagnosed with severe mental illness; schizophrenia; bipolar disorder or severe anxiety disorder compared to resources and programs for targeting adults with physical or intellectual handicaps only.

Desired outcome is to improve schooling experience and assist those wishing to complete their studies by providing resources and services.
Primary Reference
Stage 2 Expert Survey
Level of Evidence
IV: Evidence based on individual expert opinion.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • * Very relevant, availability not under the control of primary health care provider.
  • This should be standard policy for all social roles in public/private institutionals - why only school ?
  • This is dependent on psycho-educational assesment and is not actionable by family physicians
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 53
Actionability 109
Overall Importance 55
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 82
Clinicians 74
Consumers 35
Decision Makers 90
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 64
Rural Areas 39
Federal Stakeholders 61
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
98 87 84 96 80 44 50 92 66 121 80 91 105
 
Overall Rank

      

75


SA16g (B1224)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.71 0.54 0.36 0.71 1.61 6.15 15.3 45.82 28.81
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2.51 3.12 7.83 2.03 8.58 9.23 27.06 21.2 18.43
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
5.5 27.28 67.23
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada